Excited Delirium

Stories about Excited Delirium, the Shock Economy and a little fiction here and there.

My feedback on ‘the defense of marketing’

I read this article and got very frustrated.

Here’s my response:

So … you want your cake and you want to eat it too?

I read this and realized you’re not really defending marketing.  You’re trying to justify giving my cash to someone else when they haven’t earned it.

As a taxpayer, the question is ‘why’.  Why did these companies get so far down into the abyss without doing a little self-inspection?

Why did the CEOs of the ‘big 3′ go to Washington, cap in hand, looking for taxpayer money, only to fly home in their Gulfstreams weeping about how badly they got screwed by being told they’d have to have a plan for the cash?

Why is it that we, as taxpayers, are being asked to pay for misuse of funds, corruption up the ying-yang and decadence beyond belief when people are in the streets starving?

Why are we told to manage our own budgets and keep our own houses in order when the ‘brightest’ and ‘best’ on the planet are completely incapable of balancing their books?

Why should we have a separate set of rules for them?

When delinquents are running these companies and grinding them into the ground, why should we be asked to lift them up?

Why should we save the ego of a bunch of macho morons who one day are the Masters of the Universe debt/derivatives traders and the next are whining about how they broke their machine and they need daddy (or Uncle Sam) to fix it?

That’s not capitalism:  it’s stupidity.

You’re damn right I should have a right to expect restrictions or conditions on loans.  These people aren’t leaders.  They’re like monkeys playing with dynamite.

This market isn’t free.  It never has been.  Our ‘business leaders’ have been so focused on lobbying, monopoly and the concentration of power that they forgot about the people that buy their products.  They’ve focused on making the 30-year fridge a 3-year fridge.  Who cares about the landfills?  Canada’s a big country.  They’ve concentrated on how to minimize the number of full-time jobs there are in the country.  They’ve told us that there’s nothing to see here when people starve because of killer GM seeds.  They’ve convinced us that the financial system needs fixing, but by the same people that have ruined Latin America and Africa.  They’ve turned Iraq and the rest of the Middle East into a cess pool all so that they can maximize their ‘disaster capitalist’ strategy.  More retirement money disappeared yesterday because they told us that Bell would sell for $42 and today it’s trading at $26 because of ‘some concerns’ about the accounting.  They told us that deficits were bad and now that they’re in power, deficits are inevitable.

I argue that we should save our money, stop the bailouts and let the whole lot of them fail and see how they like waiting in line at a soup kitchen behind someone who smells like a latrine.

Maybe they’ll finally learn a thing or two that their business schools clearly didn’t teach:  Ethics, morality and a genuine sense of social responsibility.

Putting a Face on Harper Economics

A couple of weeks ago, I was listening to a radio show and a woman called in to describe how she and her husband had lost a massive part of their personal savings because of the elimination of the benefits with income trusts when the Conservatives took power in 2006.

This family had to sell their house.  They are retired.  They are broke.  They are now living week-to-week, being fed from soup kitchens and all because a cold and heartless government didn’t pause long enough to consider the human face on laissez-faire policies.

She cried on air as she described her situation.  She was humiliated and I cried as well as I listened.

And today, the Conservatives stand poised, ready to make another economic statement, unwilling to do anything until next spring when the worst of the recession will be upon us.  No infrastructure announcements.  No mercy for Canadians who want a future.  No waiving of some of the tax cuts to the world’s largest corporations that can afford to pay taxes a little more than most people on the streets.

(Of course, the companies that ‘we’ gave tax cuts to are all going broke, so remind me:  what was the point of corporate tax cuts when none of them are making money?)

No.

Today, Canadians will get more heartless and cruel neo-con policies.  Federal spending across the country will be slashed, properties and assets of the Government of Canada will be sold off in the biggest fire-sale ever, and Canadians will be left out in the cold just as winter approaches.

Expect the worse.  Anything better will be a surprise and will be positioned as such.  They’ll have one or two statements where they’ll make peanut butter sandwiches sound like manna from heaven, as they distract us from the great gutting of Canada.

Oh … and by the way … none of this would be necessary if they zeroed in on the massive, bloated defence budget.

Harper’s Plan: Death to Canada by 1000 Cuts

There’s something about the Harper Administration that I can’t quite understand.

I’ve never seen a more passive government.

The world is falling to pieces and all these people can do is react in terms of cuts.  Thousands of cuts that will bleed Canada to death.

Tomorrow, Jim Flaherty will release his long anticipated Economic Statement, but the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives has already released their statement.  Full story and details can be found here .

Flaherty will likely outline how little money we all collectively have, particularly now that tax cuts for mega-corporations are starting to kick in, but also because revenues from the Tar Patch may not be as great now that oil prices are ‘languishing’ down around the $US 50 level.

As a result, he’ll probably identify some pretty severe cuts.  I doubt they’ll be considerate and it’s more than likely they’ll leave a big lump of coal in the stockings of every Canadian, just in time for the Holidays.

However, the CCPA has predicted that things will be much more dire than what Flaherty can even whip up as economic drama, fueling public panic and reminding us that the Conservatives are the last kind of ideologues that we want ‘stearing this ship through the economic storm’.

I have a simple solution:  attack the Defence Budget like it’s a gang of environmentalists plotting to swarm a Cheney-lover’s convention.  Show no mercy.  Lock it down.  Taser it to death.  Reign it in.

We (in ‘we’, I mean ‘they’) plan to spend approximately $50 billion on this bloated and useless industry per year over the next ten years (for a total of $500 billion by 2020).  For what?  Yes, a few thousand jobs depend on these massive gluttonous spending levels, but what about the millions of Canadians that don’t rely on this industry?

Why not start shifting some of that money to productive Canadian infrastructure investments instead of pouring OUR CASH into the pockets of warmongers?

We need that money.  Its ours.  Let’s invest it today to save ourselves from the mess the Conservatives (in Canada and abroad) have created for us.

Bill Moyers With Benjamin Barber on Consumerism

I’ve admired Bill Moyers since seeing his interview iwth Joseph Campbell a long, long time ago.  Since then, any time he comes up, he seems to come as being someone who’s not quite radical, but certainly someone who wants change in the progressive sense of the word.

Anyways, I wanted to save this link for Buy Nothing Day (Friday, November 25), but have decided to post it a few days earlier just so that we get a little more in the spirit in the advance of the big day and get the ball rolling.

Keep your money.

Buy Nothing Day – November 28 – Take Action

I’ve always had difficulty buying in to buy nothing day.  There.  It’s out there.  For 17 years, I’ve enjoyed the concept from the sidelines.

But it’s not for ethical or moral reasons.  It was considerably more of a functional issue.  For example, if I drove my car to visit a friend’s house to eat home-made soup, would the gas consumption be considered ‘consumption’?  I suppose not, since technically, I’m not buying anything THAT DAY, but it gets into the level of complexity that ‘vegetarian’ versus ‘vegan’ might have.

However, this year the light has gone on.  At a certain point, it’s all about making a simple commitment.  A commitment to change.

And this year, I’m committed.  It’s not because I think I can live a day without the perils of consumer life interjecting themselves as I drop off my son, do my work or talk to people about US Thanksgiving and the state of the world.

It’s because I’m getting increasingly annoyed by the bailouts, the reckless mis-management of our economy and social structure (in Canada, the US and the rest of the world), the obliviousness of neo-cons to the world around them and the whining and crying of massive monopolies as they have their hands outs in the twilight hours of the Bush Administration.

I now know that NOTHING would send a stronger signal to the ‘powers that be’ that we’re sick and tired of being treated like cattle.

So, c’mon everyone!  Buy Nothing.  Send a message.  This is where it begins.

(P.S.  If you absolutely must buy something, please try to make it local.)

BUY NOTHING DAY ORGANIZERS CONFRONT THE ECONOMIC MELTDOWN HEAD ON

Now in its 17th year, Buy Nothing Day is celebrated every November by environmentalists, social activists and concerned citizens in over 65 countries around the world. Over the years, Buy Nothing Day (followed by Buy Nothing Christmas) has exploded into a global movement, inspiring the world’s citizens to live more simply and buy a whole lot less.

Designed to coincide with Black Friday (which this year falls on Friday, November 28) in the United States, and the unofficial start of the international holiday shopping season (Saturday, November 29), the festival takes many shapes, from relaxed family outings, to free, non-commercial street parties, to politically charged public protests, credit-card cut-ups and pranks and shenanigans of all kinds. Anyone can take part provided they spend a day without spending.

Featured by such media giants as CNN, USA Today, MSNBC, Wired, the BBC, The Age and the CBC, Buy Nothing Day has gained momentum in recent years as the climate crisis has driven people to seek out greener alternatives to unrestrained consumption.

This year, Buy Nothing Day organizers are confronting the economic meltdown head-on – asking citizens, policy makers and pundits to examine our economic crisis.

"If you dig a little past the surface you’ll see that this financial meltdown is not about liquidity, toxic derivatives or unregulated markets, it’s really about culture," says the co-founder of Adbusters Media Foundation, Kalle Lasn. "It’s our culture of excess and meaningless consumption — the glorified spending and borrowing of the past decade that’s at the root of the crisis we now find ourselves in."

Economic meltdown, together with the ecological crisis of climate change could be the beginning of a major global cultural shift — the dawn of a new age: the age of Post-Materialism.

"A simpler, pared-down lifestyle – one in which we’re not drowning in debt – may well be the answer to this crisis we’re in," says Lasn. "Living within our means will also make us happier and healthier than we’ve been in years."
________________________________________
Do what you can to spread the the BND message this year. Blog it, up-vote it on Digg, or slap a poster on a wall. This could be the breakthrough year when the heavy consumers of the world finally get it.
Warm regards,
The Adbusters Team

GM Doing Really Well … Somewhere Else

Executives of the auto industry are embarassing themselves as they go to Capitol Hill with cap in hand asking for handouts.  They talk of financial crisis, economic meltdown and no demand for their gas guzzling trucks and SUVs.

They couldn’t see it coming.

But somehow, their international operations do exceptionally well.  Full story here .

There are a lot of reasons to be suspicious about this bulls**t.  I suspect that most of the plan is to bilk North American taxpayers, remove union jobs and pension liiabilities from their books and hope that North American consumers will continue to buy their cars, regardless of where they’re made.

And the mainstream media is whipping people into a frenzy, making us think it will be the end of the world if we don’t dump piles of cash into their bottomless pits.

Well, it’s not going to work with me.  I personally believe that we should invest that money in new industries like the manufacture of wind turbines or solar panels, but apparently that would make me a dreamer and I might as well be asking for the f**king cure for cancer as well.

Indian Farmers Committing Suicide en masse … because of GM seeds?

This story is sad.  It tells about the dismal treatment of a working class in India that has been manipulated into believing it can dig itself out of povery, all for the benefit of a single corporation known as Monsanto.

By Andrew Malone

When Prince Charles claimed thousands of Indian farmers were killing themselves after using GM crops, he was branded a scaremonger. In fact, as this chilling dispatch reveals, it’s even WORSE than he feared.

The children were inconsolable. Mute with shock and fighting back tears, they huddled beside their mother as friends and neighbours prepared their father’s body for cremation on a blazing bonfire built on the cracked, barren fields near their home.

As flames consumed the corpse, Ganjanan, 12, and Kalpana, 14, faced a grim future. While Shankara Mandaukar had hoped his son and daughter would have a better life under India’s economic boom, they now face working as slave labour for a few pence a day. Landless and homeless, they will be the lowest of the low.

Indian farmer

Human tragedy: A farmer and child in India’s ‘suicide belt’

Shankara, respected farmer, loving husband and father, had taken his own life. Less than 24 hours earlier, facing the loss of his land due to debt, he drank a cupful of chemical insecticide.

Unable to pay back the equivalent of two years’ earnings, he was in despair. He could see no way out.

There were still marks in the dust where he had writhed in agony. Other villagers looked on – they knew from experience that any intervention was pointless – as he lay doubled up on the ground, crying out in pain and vomiting.

Moaning, he crawled on to a bench outside his simple home 100 miles from Nagpur in central India. An hour later, he stopped making any noise. Then he stopped breathing. At 5pm on Sunday, the life of Shankara Mandaukar came to an end.

As neighbours gathered to pray outside the family home, Nirmala Mandaukar, 50, told how she rushed back from the fields to find her husband dead. ‘He was a loving and caring man,’ she said, weeping quietly.

‘But he couldn’t take any more. The mental anguish was too much. We have lost everything.’

Shankara’s crop had failed – twice. Of course, famine and pestilence are part of India’s ancient story.

But the death of this respected farmer has been blamed on something far more modern and sinister: genetically modified crops.

Shankara, like millions of other Indian farmers, had been promised previously unheard of harvests and income if he switched from farming with traditional seeds to planting GM seeds instead.

Beguiled by the promise of future riches, he borrowed money in order to buy the GM seeds. But when the harvests failed, he was left with spiralling debts – and no income.

So Shankara became one of an estimated 125,000 farmers to take their own life as a result of the ruthless drive to use India as a testing ground for genetically modified crops.

The crisis, branded the ‘GM Genocide’ by campaigners, was highlighted recently when Prince Charles claimed that the issue of GM had become a ‘global moral question’ – and the time had come to end its unstoppable march.

Speaking by video link to a conference in the Indian capital, Delhi, he infuriated bio-tech leaders and some politicians by condemning ‘the truly appalling and tragic rate of small farmer suicides in India, stemming… from the failure of many GM crop varieties’.

Ranged against the Prince are powerful GM lobbyists and prominent politicians, who claim that genetically modified crops have transformed Indian agriculture, providing greater yields than ever before.

The rest of the world, they insist, should embrace ‘the future’ and follow suit.

So who is telling the truth? To find out, I travelled to the ‘suicide belt’ in Maharashtra state.

What I found was deeply disturbing – and has profound implications for countries, including Britain, debating whether to allow the planting of seeds manipulated by scientists to circumvent the laws of nature.

For official figures from the Indian Ministry of Agriculture do indeed confirm that in a huge humanitarian crisis, more than 1,000 farmers kill themselves here each month.

Simple, rural people, they are dying slow, agonising deaths. Most swallow insecticide – a pricey substance they were promised they would not need when they were coerced into growing expensive GM crops.

It seems that many are massively in debt to local money-lenders, having over-borrowed to purchase GM seed.

Pro-GM experts claim that it is rural poverty, alcoholism, drought and ‘agrarian distress’ that is the real reason for the horrific toll.

But, as I discovered during a four-day journey through the epicentre of the disaster, that is not the full story.

Monsanto

Death seeds: A Greenpeace protester sprays milk-based paint on a Monsanto research soybean field near Atlantic, Iowa

In one small village I visited, 18 farmers had committed suicide after being sucked into GM debts. In some cases, women have taken over farms from their dead husbands – only to kill themselves as well.

Latta Ramesh, 38, drank insecticide after her crops failed – two years after her husband disappeared when the GM debts became too much.

She left her ten-year-old son, Rashan, in the care of relatives. ‘He cries when he thinks of his mother,’ said the dead woman’s aunt, sitting listlessly in shade near the fields.

Village after village, families told how they had fallen into debt after being persuaded to buy GM seeds instead of traditional cotton seeds.

The price difference is staggering: £10 for 100 grams of GM seed, compared with less than £10 for 1,000 times more traditional seeds.

But GM salesmen and government officials had promised farmers that these were ‘magic seeds’ – with better crops that would be free from parasites and insects.

Indeed, in a bid to promote the uptake of GM seeds, traditional varieties were banned from many government seed banks.

The authorities had a vested interest in promoting this new biotechnology. Desperate to escape the grinding poverty of the post-independence years, the Indian government had agreed to allow new bio-tech giants, such as the U.S. market-leader Monsanto, to sell their new seed creations.

In return for allowing western companies access to the second most populated country in the world, with more than one billion people, India was granted International Monetary Fund loans in the Eighties and Nineties, helping to launch an economic revolution.

But while cities such as Mumbai and Delhi have boomed, the farmers’ lives have slid back into the dark ages.

Though areas of India planted with GM seeds have doubled in two years – up to 17 million acres – many famers have found there is a terrible price to be paid.

Far from being ‘magic seeds’, GM pest-proof ‘breeds’ of cotton have been devastated by bollworms, a voracious parasite.

Nor were the farmers told that these seeds require double the amount of water. This has proved a matter of life and death.

With rains failing for the past two years, many GM crops have simply withered and died, leaving the farmers with crippling debts and no means of paying them off.

Having taken loans from traditional money lenders at extortionate rates, hundreds of thousands of small farmers have faced losing their land as the expensive seeds fail, while those who could struggle on faced a fresh crisis.

When crops failed in the past, farmers could still save seeds and replant them the following year.

But with GM seeds they cannot do this. That’s because GM seeds contain so- called ‘terminator technology’, meaning that they have been genetically modified so that the resulting crops do not produce viable seeds of their own.

As a result, farmers have to buy new seeds each year at the same punitive prices. For some, that means the difference between life and death.

Take the case of Suresh Bhalasa, another farmer who was cremated this week, leaving a wife and two children.

As night fell after the ceremony, and neighbours squatted outside while sacred cows were brought in from the fields, his family had no doubt that their troubles stemmed from the moment they were encouraged to buy BT Cotton, a geneticallymodified plant created by Monsanto.

‘We are ruined now,’ said the dead man’s 38-year-old wife. ‘We bought 100 grams of BT Cotton. Our crop failed twice. My husband had become depressed. He went out to his field, lay down in the cotton and swallowed insecticide.’

Villagers bundled him into a rickshaw and headed to hospital along rutted farm roads. ‘He cried out that he had taken the insecticide and he was sorry,’ she said, as her family and neighbours crowded into her home to pay their respects. ‘He was dead by the time they got to hospital.’

Asked if the dead man was a ‘drunkard’ or suffered from other ‘social problems’, as alleged by pro-GM officials, the quiet, dignified gathering erupted in anger. ‘No! No!’ one of the dead man’s brothers exclaimed. ‘Suresh was a good man. He sent his children to school and paid his taxes.

‘He was strangled by these magic seeds. They sell us the seeds, saying they will not need expensive pesticides but they do. We have to buy the same seeds from the same company every year. It is killing us. Please tell the world what is happening here.’

Monsanto has admitted that soaring debt was a ‘factor in this tragedy’. But pointing out that cotton production had doubled in the past seven years, a spokesman added that there are other reasons for the recent crisis, such as ‘untimely rain’ or drought, and pointed out that suicides have always been part of rural Indian life.

Officials also point to surveys saying the majority of Indian farmers want GM seeds  -  no doubt encouraged to do so by aggressive marketing tactics.

During the course of my inquiries in Maharastra, I encountered three ‘independent’ surveyors scouring villages for information about suicides. They insisted that GM seeds were only 50 per cent more expensive – and then later admitted the difference was 1,000 per cent.

(A Monsanto spokesman later insisted their seed is ‘only double’ the price of ‘official’ non-GM seed – but admitted that the difference can be vast if cheaper traditional seeds are sold by ‘unscrupulous’ merchants, who often also sell ‘fake’ GM seeds which are prone to disease.)

With rumours of imminent government compensation to stem the wave of deaths, many farmers said they were desperate for any form of assistance. ‘We just want to escape from our problems,’ one said. ‘We just want help to stop any more of us dying.’

Prince Charles is so distressed by the plight of the suicide farmers that he is setting up a charity, the Bhumi Vardaan Foundation, to help those affected and promote organic Indian crops instead of GM.

India’s farmers are also starting to fight back. As well as taking GM seed distributors hostage and staging mass protests, one state government is taking legal action against Monsanto for the exorbitant costs of GM seeds.

This came too late for Shankara Mandauker, who was 80,000 rupees (about £1,000) in debt when he took his own life. ‘I told him that we can survive,’ his widow said, her children still by her side as darkness fell. ‘I told him we could find a way out. He just said it was better to die.’

But the debt does not die with her husband: unless she can find a way of paying it off, she will not be able to afford the children’s schooling. They will lose their land, joining the hordes seen begging in their thousands by the roadside throughout this vast, chaotic country.

Cruelly, it’s the young who are suffering most from the ‘GM Genocide’  -  the very generation supposed to be lifted out of a life of hardship and misery by these ‘magic seeds’.

Here in the suicide belt of India, the cost of the genetically modified future is murderously high.

Could Bush be Tried for War Crimes?

This story argues that Bush may be tried for war crimes.

At the risk of sounding obvious, what do you think?

British Police Make Massive Taser Purchase

In an odd way, I almost support this action, mainly because UK police officers have worked without guns for so long.

However, I’m still a little anxious about any deal made by public authorities that support Taser International, the maker of the taser.  Giving them more money just makes the machine go on and on and on.

Full story here from the BBC .

Innovation: Drawing Water from Air

I was fascinated by this story and was excited to see that the company (Element Four ) is based in Kelowna, BC.  Let’s hope it stays that way, but I suppose that’s a different story :)

My hopes are high as I read something like this, excited that a number of companies will turn their focus from how to extract the most blood (or in most cases, tar) from stones (or in the case of Canada, sands), bringing forth an era when we might actually be proud again of our scientific prowess.

What struck me most in this article was the commentary on water bottles (and the inherent plea that we need to stop drinking bottled water):

For the environmentally conscious consumer, the WaterMill has an obvious appeal. Bottled water is an ecological catastrophe. In the US alone, about 30bn litres of bottled water is consumed every year at a cost of about $11bn (£7.4bn).

According to the Earth Policy Institute, about 1.5m barrels of oil – enough to power 100,000 cars for a year – is used just to make the plastic. The process also uses twice as much water as fits inside the container, not to mention the 30m bottles that go into landfills every day in the US. But the mill also has downsides, not least its $1,200 cost when it goes on sale in America, the UK, Italy, Australia and Japan in the spring. In these credit crunch times that might dissuade many potential buyers, though Ritchey points out that at $0.3 per litre, it is much cheaper than bottled water and would pay for itself in a couple of years.

Now … why isn’t the Government of Ontario or Canada looking at companies like this and offering them MORE cash so that they can survive the recession (or state of economic calamity – take your pick), expand and become Canada’s new manufacturing / innovation vanguard?  That would take vision, and I doubt our governments have that.  They’re still too busy spinning their tires with 19th century laggards.