Monthly Archives: March 2018

When Doug Ford Says This Kind Of Stuff, What Does That Say About His Supporters?

Posted on by 0 comment

In the last 24 hours, Doug Ford is quoted as saying:

The list goes on …

When Doug Ford is making statements that are just so ridiculous, what does it say about his supporters?

I know many people that are Conservative and every time I see them, I want to give their head a shake.

They should be ashamed.

Suffice to say, they’re not friends any more.

Doug Ford is NOT an option.

Unfortunately, the financial terror and horror that is Kathleen Wynne is making his job easy.

People that support the Liberals should be ashamed because the Kathleen Wynne math is ten times worse than Doug Ford’s BS.

Category: Uncategorized

No Apology = No Preferential Tax Treatment

Posted on by 0 comment

Why is it so hard for the Catholic church to say it’s sorry?

Time and again, their arrogance and hubris blocks them from doing the right thing.

The Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission was very clear in its recommendations, including an important acknowledgement and apology from the religious institutions that brought about such pain and sorrow with the residential school program.

The Protestants apologized.

The United Church apologized.

The Anglicans have apologized.

But the Catholics stand fast and refuse to apologize for the wrongs committed, despite the fact that Catholic-run schools were about two-thirds of the 150 schools across Canada.

So, let them do that. Let them ignore the responsibility of trying to heal wounds.

But let them also enjoy existence in Canada without any tax status, be it tax-free status for property taxes or status as an official status in Canada.

At a bare minimum, Canadians should withhold donations to the Catholic church until it takes ownership for the crimes committed against First Nations people in Canada.

It’s almost impossible to estimate that massive wealth that gets transferred from Canadians to the Vatican every year, be it donations, fundraisers or even gains made from ownership of some of the most valuable real estate in the country.

There are hundreds of churches and thousands of priests across the country servicing millions of Canadians.

Of course, the real truth is that nothing of the sort will happen. Nearly 40% of Canadians (wow! I had no idea) identify as a Catholic. It’s unlikely that so many will abandon their adherence to such an archaic and twisted role model.

Category: Uncategorized

Doug Ford in London: A Crowd Abuzz With Hundreds of WASPs

Posted on by 0 comment

Doug Ford visited London last night.

Let’s hope the room full of 500 very old, very white and very frustrating voters comprises the ONLY 500 Doug Ford supporters in south west Ontario.

Doug Ford White Nation

But let’s face it. That’s not true.

I know many people who I consider friends (although maybe not for much longer) who are very articulate, intelligent and compassionate people.

And yet they’re blindly stupid, ignorant, rude and downright vicious when it comes to supporting dirt like Doug Ford.

I don’t understand the paradox.

Is it the loathing of Liberals that compels people to abandon all of their principles and dignity? Or annoyance with the NDP’s clinging to the 19th century that bums them out?

Honestly, I understand. I don’t want to see Kathleen Wynne or other Liberals from her era enter the Ontario Legislature in the fall of 2018.

But I refuse to even acknowledge Douche Ford as a leader worthy of a vote.

After 2018, the Ontario Conservatives need to get their act together.



Category: Uncategorized

Are Mega Transit Projects the ‘Swimming Pools’ of the 20s?

Posted on by 0 comment

During the last half of the century and a few years into the new millenium, every village, town, city and metropolis seemed hell-bent on building a big, giant swimming pool.

It seemed to be almost mandatory for any city worth its salt to have somewhere to go and sit in someone else’s pee.

So now that most cities have moved on and are patching the endless leaky pipes and mildewy change rooms, how are planners supposed to waste public money?


What’s that? How could I possibly stand in the way of transit? Especially public transit?

I mean, I’d have to be the most NIMBYist, elitist, backwards, pubic-hating moron on the planet to stand in the way of vast sums of money being spent on public transit.

Well, I guess I’m one of those.

But let me backtrack a little and please, hear me out.

Let’s start again with a brief history lesson.

Transit used to be central to folks that lived in the core area. Cities were serviced by hundreds of miles of light rail transit (LRT) that brought people to every nook and cranny of their city, homes, entertainment and shopping.

Of course, cities were cities and within a very short distance, rural was rural.

Sprawl just didn’t exist.

Over time, the evolution of transportation in almost every town, city and metropolis looked a little like this:

  • Pre-1950s: Original core: rail, walking, a few buggies, lots of horse poop
  • Post-war: sprawl. Everyone wanted their piece of suburbia, including the cars that went with it. Buses serviced a few people.
  • 1980s+: sprawl continued, cars continued, roads serviced every nook and cranny. A few brave souls took to walking or cycling, but took their lives in their hands when drivers hunted them down.
  • 2000s+: a return to mega-transit projects that would ease the tension and congestion brought on by the abundance of the car.

Those cities that pre-dated the emergence of the car were fortunate enough to have had a tax base of citizens that lived centrally and who were willing to finance efficient transit systems (more LRTs, subways, trains) as opposed to roads.

Of course, in North America, there are only a small handful of these cities. The vast majority of cities grew beyond 300,000-400,000 people (a rough critical mass needed to support efficient transportation infrastructure) only in the latter half of the 20th century.

This resulted in buses being pitched by manufacturers like GM as the only effective way to reach out to the growing numbers of suburban commuters.

And even though buses theoretically carry more people, more people don’t use them.

All buses do is choke off the arteries, making it harder for everyone to complete their morning or evening commute.

Politics also became more fractured as a result of sprawl. More and more representatives were from suburban or rural areas, resulting in tension between the best options for downtown areas as opposed to what was good for suburbanites.

To summarize, sprawl is the cancer of all development and living in North America, and cars are simply the excessive white blood cells causing leukemia.

This situation has resulted in demands for intensification and a return to consolidating population along with services. The result is that everything becomes more efficient as the same level of service gets delivered over a smaller area, resulting in lower cost per capita.

Getting back to transit …

Designing ‘rapid’ transit systems that basically endorse and support sprawl is a step backwards from the evolution of intensification.

Spending billions on connecting disconnected neighbourhoods is an inefficient process and also fails to recognize that small neighbourhoods should be treated more like hubs and communities as opposed to spokes to a hub.

The funding formula is also severely flawed. Provincial and federal governments pay out money based on the volume of buses and the number of miles they drive every day. Municipal transit commissions no longer count ridership. They simply ‘guesstimate’ usage based on the formula above so that they can maximize funds received.

Hence, the ’empty bus syndrome’, where taxpayers continue to marvel and wonder at the vast parade of empty buses driving around town at all hours. Except when people actually need them.

For those who know and who read this blog, you’ll know that my answer to the problem is to encourage the development of ‘digital destinations’ and expand the flow of binary code as opposed to two-way traffic.

Reaching back to the previous point, I also argue that the more we encourage ‘local’ development as opposed to visiting a ‘core’ area day in, day out, the more we’ll have independent hubs of economic activity.

But that’s not ‘sexy’ enough for politicians, is it?

Everyone talks about ‘shovels in roads’, an expression that makes me cringe because I know that the only people who are benefitting from this nonsense are the overpaid consultants and construction contractors. Many of whom happen to be good friends of the politicians.

For more on overspending on infrastructure projects, check this out.

And finally, there’s technology. Supporters of bus transit argue that diesel and inefficient use of major routes is the way forward, but they neglect the emergence of continuous-use, on-demand transportation opportunities presented by technology companies.

Yes, I understand that autonomous vehicles will not replace cars, but if politicians organize regulations in a way that encourage multi-person autonomous vehicle use (ie. HOV lanes, HOV credits), then we will significantly reduce the cars on the road.

Category: infrastructure, transit

A Reminder of Who Rob Ford Is …

Posted on by 0 comment

Ontario ‘Progressive’ Conservative Party just elected Doug Ford as their leader.

Here’s a quick reminder of just a few of Ford’s traits and history as a politician:

I am no fan of Kathleen Wynne, but it seems like the Conservatives have made it that much easier for her to win again.

Ugh. This is intensely frustrating.

Ontario voters will be pushed into making a choice that is the least awful.

Liberal? Definitely not.

Conservative? Not on your life.

NDP? Impossible.

That leaves the Greens. Welcome to my political spectrum, Mike Schreiner!

Category: Uncategorized