Tag Archives: green economy

Green America: 7 Fixes for the Green Economy

Posted on by 4 comments

Green America (was Co-op America) has added 7 recommendations for a new Green Economy. The original link can be found here.

Here’s a quick summary of the 7 fixes:

  1. Green Energy = Green Jobs
  2. Clean Energy ‘Victory Bonds’ (I would buy these!)
  3. Reduce, Reuse, Rethink (hint: consumerism is not the answer)
  4. Go Green, Fair Trade, Local (Use the National Green Pages index – is there a Canadian equivalent? If so, please post it below)
  5. Community Investing (US version – again: a Canadian equivalent anyone?
  6. Shareowner Activism
  7. Building Community

I would argue that there are many, many more: Continue reading

Don’t fix the economy: Change it

Posted on by 0 comment

This story from the Toronto Star was inspirational in that the real story – change – is making it to mainstream media.

Here are some highlights:

Neither the Conservative minority nor the opposition has proposed anything that will set Canada on a long-term path toward the kind of economy that will both provide for the well-being of Canadians and enhance and preserve the ecological community of which people are but one dependent part.

Here are six steps we can take toward a truly balanced budget that will allow Canadians, and all people on Earth, to live fulfilling, healthy, yet more ecologically compatible, lives.

  • Recognize that the economy is part of the biosphere. A comprehensive economic plan must be based on the scientific fact that the global economy is a subsidiary of the natural order. Economic policies should be attuned to the limited capacity of Earth’s biosphere to provide for humans and other life and to assimilate their waste. Photosynthesis and sunlight are as essential to the framework for economic budgets and expenditures as the laws of supply and demand.
  • Acknowledge that we need new institutions. An economic renewal tailored to the 21st century would establish institutions committed to fitting the human economy to Earth’s limited life-support capacity. Canada, with its token efforts to address climate change, is far off the track. We need something like the central reserve banks, but which look after shares of the Earth’s ecological capacity, not just interest rates and the money supply. Money should be recognized as a social licence to use part of Earth’s life-support capacity. Some functions of governance would have to operate at a global level, through a federation modelled perhaps on the European Union, with enforceable laws designed to assure that individual nations don’t overrun Earth’s limits. The rules for the developed countries that are responsible for the current ecological crisis should be different from those for developing ones.
  • Acknowledge that unlimited growth on a finite planet makes no sense. Most people wrongly believe that unlimited growth and wealth accumulation are the "natural laws" of the economy – inviolable, even though together they undermine the Earth’s ecological and social systems. We face a moral challenge: bring the global economy into a right relationship with the planet and its human and non-human inhabitants or suffer the increasing destruction of Earth’s finite life-support systems and social structures. Growth in consumption is a nonsensical response to the sharp decline in Earth’s biophysical systems that is caused by overconsumption. Our new ecological and climate reality demands new ways to live within the means of the Earth.
  • Fairness matters. A "right" human-Earth relationship would recognize humans as part of an interdependent web of life on a finite planet. The economy must recognize the rights of the human poor and of millions of other species to their place in the sun. In a world awash in money, addressing poverty only with growth reflects a tragic lack of moral imagination. Indeed, in pushing for more "free" trade as it is currently understood, Canada would entrench an ongoing addiction to consumption, pursued in a manner that often ravages the bio-productivity of developing countries.
  • Expand the discussion. The new knowledge that will forever mark this period in human history is the overwhelming scientific evidence that we are overconsuming the planet and accelerating toward ecological catastrophe. The short-term approaches of most ministers of finance and professional economists don’t account for how the planet works, or even that the economy exists on a finite planet. Scientists morally committed to protecting the global commons and researching ecological limits to the global economy need much more funding and influence in policy-making.
  • Look beyond technological fixes. Bold new leadership is needed that will focus on all four policy "theatres" relevant to human ecological impact and provide the moral footing that will lead people, individually and collectively, to choose lifestyles with radically lower impact. The four policy variables are: technology; population; wealth and consumption; and morals and customs. These factors should together shape Parliament’s rethinking of the current economic system. Technology can increase efficiency of energy and resources use, yet it is overemphasized as a solution. Pushing technological solutions like hydrogen cars and genetically modified agriculture is much easier politically than asking people to consume less or have fewer children. Unfortunately, technology alone cannot solve the ecological crisis. For one thing, efficiency gains often lead to greater, not lower, consumption. An example is the squandering of Quebec’s underpriced hydroelectric power.

Investments in new "green" technology need to be coupled to a regulatory structure that ensures that efficiency does not result in more impact, along with massive investment in creating or restoring natural systems that build bioproductivity. Economic policy must promote not more affluence as currently defined, but more sufficiency for all Canadians – so that all may live with self-respect, without overconsumption.

Peter G. Brown is a professor at McGill University. Geoffrey Garver is an environmental consultant and lectures in law at Université de Montréal and Université Laval. They are co-authors of Right Relationship: Building a Whole Earth Economy .

US in Depression

Posted on by 0 comment

The Economist magazine has diagnosed that the US economy is in a depression , not a recession.

While the throngs of journalists, publicists, politicians and other folks are loathe to confess that North America has entered the greatest recession on record, I commend the Economist for having the balls to finally show it like it is, even if they’re still very indirect about it.

Now … let’s do something about it.

First , we need to acknowledge that a drepession may not be all that bad, assuming of course, you don’t believe the media version of economic crisis.

What we’re going through is a radical structural and social change.  The folks who make money today and in the future are not the same folks who used to make money.  Nor should they be.  We used to support a lot of inefficient enterprises and that should end.

Expanding that idea, we need to do a lot more research into the health enterprises of today versus the unhealthy corporations of yesterday.

My gut is that we’ll discover a very vibrant and cohesive economy of smaller businesses doing things like selling organic produce through online delivery or co-ops with unheard of loyalty to their brand because they make quality, fair-trade product.  We’d also find that the average consumer no longer wants an SUV, the most profitable item for a car manufacturer to sell, not just because it’s a gas guzzler, but also because we’re bothered by the excessive footprint that a car that will last just 4-5 years will have on our planet.  People want products and services that will actually a little longer than lettuce in your veggie drawer (and don’t get me started about fridges, either).

We’ve handed over our ability to control the economy to a small group of monopolists who believe that centralized control is the best thing for us and we’re proving time and time again that this is the absolute worst thing that we could do.

But that’s just a hunch.

The second thing we have to do is something that I recommend again and again:  act with your wallets.  When you shop at places like Wal-Mart or Dollar Stores, you throw good money after bad and you endorse the cycle of poor decision-making.

When you shop for the things you need, buy local.  Buy organic.  After that, don’t buy.  Save your cash, assuming you’ve got some left to save.  Donate to smaller, non-religious organizations that return that money to the community ten-fold.

Finally, the third most important thing we can ALL do is become active advocates.  We need to be so loud that it will be impossible to shut us out.  Demand that we stop bailing out all of these losers.  When you were growing up, did the teacher always pass the failing student?  Well, sometimes they did with a little trick called ‘bell curving’, but that’s a different topic.  Were we told that coming in last would get you the biggest pay-cheque?  What kind of message does it send when governments respond to people that create money pits for taxpayers, all the while taking home record incomes?

It’s time we stopped the bailouts and started spending money on more productive efforts like a green economy and a new social and physical infrastructure.

Anything less would be depressing.

By the way, I’m not the only one with this opinion:  it seems the idea of being sensible is taking hold with a number of other bloggers, including this one:

A Creative Revolution

If you feel the same way or know of others who are trying to send the same message, please post a link below.