Are Mega Transit Projects the ‘Swimming Pools’ of the 20s?

Posted on by 0 comment

During the last half of the century and a few years into the new millenium, every village, town, city and metropolis seemed hell-bent on building a big, giant swimming pool.

It seemed to be almost mandatory for any city worth its salt to have somewhere to go and sit in someone else’s pee.

So now that most cities have moved on and are patching the endless leaky pipes and mildewy change rooms, how are planners supposed to waste public money?


What’s that? How could I possibly stand in the way of transit? Especially public transit?

I mean, I’d have to be the most NIMBYist, elitist, backwards, pubic-hating moron on the planet to stand in the way of vast sums of money being spent on public transit.

Well, I guess I’m one of those.

But let me backtrack a little and please, hear me out.

Let’s start again with a brief history lesson.

Transit used to be central to folks that lived in the core area. Cities were serviced by hundreds of miles of light rail transit (LRT) that brought people to every nook and cranny of their city, homes, entertainment and shopping.

Of course, cities were cities and within a very short distance, rural was rural.

Sprawl just didn’t exist.

Over time, the evolution of transportation in almost every town, city and metropolis looked a little like this:

  • Pre-1950s: Original core: rail, walking, a few buggies, lots of horse poop
  • Post-war: sprawl. Everyone wanted their piece of suburbia, including the cars that went with it. Buses serviced a few people.
  • 1980s+: sprawl continued, cars continued, roads serviced every nook and cranny. A few brave souls took to walking or cycling, but took their lives in their hands when drivers hunted them down.
  • 2000s+: a return to mega-transit projects that would ease the tension and congestion brought on by the abundance of the car.

Those cities that pre-dated the emergence of the car were fortunate enough to have had a tax base of citizens that lived centrally and who were willing to finance efficient transit systems (more LRTs, subways, trains) as opposed to roads.

Of course, in North America, there are only a small handful of these cities. The vast majority of cities grew beyond 300,000-400,000 people (a rough critical mass needed to support efficient transportation infrastructure) only in the latter half of the 20th century.

This resulted in buses being pitched by manufacturers like GM as the only effective way to reach out to the growing numbers of suburban commuters.

And even though buses theoretically carry more people, more people don’t use them.

All buses do is choke off the arteries, making it harder for everyone to complete their morning or evening commute.

Politics also became more fractured as a result of sprawl. More and more representatives were from suburban or rural areas, resulting in tension between the best options for downtown areas as opposed to what was good for suburbanites.

To summarize, sprawl is the cancer of all development and living in North America, and cars are simply the excessive white blood cells causing leukemia.

This situation has resulted in demands for intensification and a return to consolidating population along with services. The result is that everything becomes more efficient as the same level of service gets delivered over a smaller area, resulting in lower cost per capita.

Getting back to transit …

Designing ‘rapid’ transit systems that basically endorse and support sprawl is a step backwards from the evolution of intensification.

Spending billions on connecting disconnected neighbourhoods is an inefficient process and also fails to recognize that small neighbourhoods should be treated more like hubs and communities as opposed to spokes to a hub.

The funding formula is also severely flawed. Provincial and federal governments pay out money based on the volume of buses and the number of miles they drive every day. Municipal transit commissions no longer count ridership. They simply ‘guesstimate’ usage based on the formula above so that they can maximize funds received.

Hence, the ’empty bus syndrome’, where taxpayers continue to marvel and wonder at the vast parade of empty buses driving around town at all hours. Except when people actually need them.

For those who know and who read this blog, you’ll know that my answer to the problem is to encourage the development of ‘digital destinations’ and expand the flow of binary code as opposed to two-way traffic.

Reaching back to the previous point, I also argue that the more we encourage ‘local’ development as opposed to visiting a ‘core’ area day in, day out, the more we’ll have independent hubs of economic activity.

But that’s not ‘sexy’ enough for politicians, is it?

Everyone talks about ‘shovels in roads’, an expression that makes me cringe because I know that the only people who are benefitting from this nonsense are the overpaid consultants and construction contractors. Many of whom happen to be good friends of the politicians.

For more on overspending on infrastructure projects, check this out.

And finally, there’s technology. Supporters of bus transit argue that diesel and inefficient use of major routes is the way forward, but they neglect the emergence of continuous-use, on-demand transportation opportunities presented by technology companies.

Yes, I understand that autonomous vehicles will not replace cars, but if politicians organize regulations in a way that encourage multi-person autonomous vehicle use (ie. HOV lanes, HOV credits), then we will significantly reduce the cars on the road.

Category: infrastructure, transit

A Reminder of Who Rob Ford Is …

Posted on by 0 comment

Ontario ‘Progressive’ Conservative Party just elected Doug Ford as their leader.

Here’s a quick reminder of just a few of Ford’s traits and history as a politician:

I am no fan of Kathleen Wynne, but it seems like the Conservatives have made it that much easier for her to win again.

Ugh. This is intensely frustrating.

Ontario voters will be pushed into making a choice that is the least awful.

Liberal? Definitely not.

Conservative? Not on your life.

NDP? Impossible.

That leaves the Greens. Welcome to my political spectrum, Mike Schreiner!

Category: Uncategorized

Let The Opioid Lawsuits Begin …

Posted on by 0 comment

Billions of dollars have been funneled from public and private health care plans into the pockets of pharmaceuticals.

In recent years, a primary source of repeating and extremely profitable sources of activity involve the prescription of opioids to unsuspecting patients.

And now it looks like some jurisdictions, starting with Camden County, New Jersey, are about to fight back.

Camden County filed a pioneering lawsuit against several drug manufacturers and distributors Wednesday, seeking to recover millions of dollars the local government has spent combating the opioid crisis over the last decade.

The suit is the first of its kind to attack pharmaceutical companies for their role in the deadly epidemic under state racketeering laws typically used to fight bribery, extortion, and other fraudulent practices, officials said.

… Named in the suit are more than a dozen drug manufacturers, distributors, and retailers. In what officials described as an unprecedented move, three members of the Sackler family, which owns OxyContin-maker Purdue Pharma, are also listed as defendants.

“The Sackler family … in our minds, are no different than members of a drug cartel that distribute drugs illegally or the drug pushers on our streets,” said Camden County Freeholder Louis Cappelli, Jr. as he stood among victims of the epidemic and members of the county’s Addiction Awareness Task Force outside of Camden’s Hall of Justice.

A representative for the family was not immediately available for comment.

This is big folks.

The first step in solving the issues inherent in the runaway opioid crisis in North America is to stop the pharmaceutical companies from pushing them on doctors and again stopping doctors from pushing them on patients.

It’s time these companies start taking responsibility for their actions and profiting at the expense of society at large.

Category: Uncategorized

An Apt Summary of the Gun Crisis in the US

Posted on by 0 comment

Republican Priorities Suck

Category: Uncategorized

Guns: The Simple Solution for the US

Posted on by 0 comment

In the wake of ANOTHER mass shooting in the US, AGAIN with a high-powered automatic rifle, ripping the lives of many young kids and adults from their parents, I have a simple solution.

Of course, we know that banning guns isn’t possible and, frankly, will only drive the market underground.

And, as Donald Trump asks, mental might tweak the issue very slightly, but it still won’t reduce the volume of guns that are available on the market. Of course, it would also fuel the pharmaceutical industry which we know lines the pockets of most politicians in the US.

I have a different approach: tax the hell out of them.

It looks like an automatic weapon in the US might cost anywhere from $500 to $1,500.

I propose a $5,000 per weapon tax on any weapon purchased in the US.

Would it drive transactions underground?  Sure it would.

But if the action saves just one life because someone having a rough day is slowed down from purchasing a new weapon, I think it’s worth considering.

And if you want to moderate the bitching and moaning from the Second Amendment folks?  Say it’s temporary.  The ‘withholding tax’ would be applied and returned within 180 days of the original purchase.

Of course, you’d have to do the same thing with ammunition.  A box of shells or bullets might have a 1,000% levy assigned to them, refundable within 90 days.

Again, these actions might just be enough to slow someone down from spraying death all over the next generation of Americans.

Category: Uncategorized

Warning: Illegal string offset 'siteid' in /home/bottree/public_html/exciteddelirium/wp-content/plugins/piwik-analytics/piwikanalytics.php on line 224