Monthly Archives: April 2009

Cons To Fill A Black (Media) Hole?

Posted on by 0 comment

In this snapshot of international advertising forecasts from emarketer , it’s predicted that the average volume of advertising in Canada will drop as little as 2.5% in 2009, but if you look at global numbers (towards the end of the article), advertising around the world will drop anywhere from 6 to 10%. As an aside, that could be as much as $50 billion in lost global ad sales.

For Canada, let’s make some assumptions:

  • The value of all advertising in Canada is roughly $25 billion per year.
  • The impact of the drop in advertising will be relatively light compared to the global spectrum, but bigger than the smallest survey.  Let’s say the drop will be around 6% of total ad sales.

What’s the point of all this? We don’t get the magical $150 million that’s being tossed around as a short-term subsidy for corporate media, but a whopping $1.5 billion in ad sales , ten times the estimate that Canada’s media giants are said to be asking for.

And … what’s the point of all this? We’re getting the soft-sell folks. We’re being told it’s just a ‘temporary small adjustment’ and a small investment by the feds will plug the hole.  We’re being told life for small programmers and stations will be back to normal once we’ve spent Canadian taxpayer dollars on back-fill to replace defunct advertisers.

Don’t be fooled. If we start pumping cash into these entities, it won’t end.

Don’t let it happen people. Once the Cons start feeding these junkies, they’ll come back for more and more and more and more …

$150 million today will be $1.5 billion tomorrow and $5 billion next year.  Don’t start because it will never stop and it will never be enough.

Want an example?  How about the car industry?  Or forestry?  Or other natural resource producers?

Here’s my suggestion: let the market work things out (for a change).  If it has to happen, let the media companies go bankrupt and do what a true market adherent does:  buy low and own the market.

Ottawa Looking to Fund Partisan Propaganda

Posted on by 0 comment

The folks in Ottawa have been dying to figure out an ‘innovative’ way to bail out Canada’s biggest media companies (besides the CBC, of course) without creating a massive voter backlash.  With that in mind, another hairbrained scheme has materialized:  spending taxpayer money on advertising (story details are pasted below).

The absurdity of this plan is laughable for a number of reasons:

  1. I normally try to avoid programming by Global, CTV or stations that are owned by these conglomerates.  A wide array of other Canadians have made a similar choice.
  2. You might as well just burn the cash because spending money on dead air to reach an audience that is gone or declining is nearly as wasteful.
  3. Using advertising to shout at existing watchers translates to paid propaganda.  This is morally reprehensible.
  4. Shouting at people with ad breaks and other interruptions is an antiquated mode of communication.

It’s the last point that I want to talk about.  We entered a massive transition more than a decade ago when technology made it easy for consumers of content to avoid advertising:

  • TIVO = avoid TV ads.
  • DVDs = avoid 20 minutes of previews, along with ads for mobile phones, cars and shoes.
  • iTunes & CDs = avoid radio ads.
  • Search = avoid online ads.

A good part of the mess that we’re in today is related to the notion that individuals can now think for themselves rather than have marketers and governments instruct them how to think and what to buy.

Of course, that hasn’t stopped people with large agencies from buying media and placing it with these companies for the Cons, largely in the form of ‘public service announcements’.  Our governments have a long history of spending oodles of taxpayer cash to inform us about ‘staying prepared for emergencies’, ‘how to spend your tax credits’, over-produced Department of Defense ads encouraging people to sign up for the reserves, etc.

Add that to the multi-billion funding of programs like the Canadian Film and Video Tax Credit which goes to channels like ‘The History Channel’ so they can show us ‘Red Dawn’ (I guess because fear mongering about Cuba has so much to do with history).

To think that we’re currently void of propaganda is excessively naive, but adding to the pile shows considerable contempt for the people of Canada.


Source:  Globe and Mail


The Globe and Mail

April 14, 2009 at 6:53 PM EDT

OTTAWA — Ottawa has a new option on the table for helping local TV stations make it through the recession: buy more government ads.

The idea, which is under discussion at the cabinet’s powerful committee on priorities and planning, is seen as a way to replace private advertising revenue that has fled since the onset of the financial crisis, a source told The Globe and Mail.

“In the short term, the most efficient way to get money out to broadcasters might be through advertising, because that’s where the initial loss was,” said the source.

“That’s where things have gone.”

Although a good number of MPs and cabinet ministers support help for the industry, the question of how best to deliver it is the subject of significant discussion. The government has talked about shelling out between $150-million and $75-million this year and $75-million next year in an effort to get money into the hands of the broadcasters quickly. However, some MPs are concerned that funnelling money directly to the broadcasters would not do much to prevent cuts. At least the government could benefit from the ads.

CanWest, CTVglobemedia and Quebecor have been lobbying the government for help as some of them consider closing or selling stations.

The broadcasters are looking for both short- and long-term aid as they battle to keep local stations and programming. Some MPs fear that the loss of local stations would rob them of a way to deliver their message to voters. It’s of particular concern to MPs representing rural areas and small towns, where communications outlets are fewer.

Simply providing more ad money won’t resolve broadcasters’ larger, structural problem, one industry source said. Revenues have been reduced through fragmenting of the market and competition from specialty cable networks and the Internet.

Another option to aid the broadcasters would be for the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission to allow cable companies to charge for transmitting their signals.

The companies have warned that at least part of such charges, known as fee-for-carriage, would be passed on to consumers, making the issue potentially difficult for the governing Tories.

“That’s becoming a bit more popular within the government, although there are points of reservation, to be sure,” said the source.

“But people recognize if they want to have their local television, there are structural issues that have to be dealt with.”

The concept of fee for carriage is expected to come up when industry players appear before the House of Commons heritage committee. The government could direct the CRTC to review the issue, or it could decide to look at it on its own. The CRTC could also consider reducing or removing certain fees broadcasters pay to the government.

It’s not clear whether the ad-buying idea would also apply to the CBC. The public broadcaster is planning 800 layoffs to cope with a $170-million shortfall.

No more bailouts, please

Posted on by 1 comment

Research credit to Impolitical .

There’s really nothing worse than the prospect of hard-line anti-government control-freaks taking over anything, let alone Canadian media.

But that seems to be in the cards, anyways, doesn’t it?

Rumours have swirled for a while about the CBC being cut.  As early as last fall, folks identified that more than $200 million would be cut.  And they were right.  We’re losing valuable and incredibly important services just when we need them most to bring this country together.

Now rumours are back, only this time, they’re about the prospect of a bunch of moochers clammering to their friends in the House to get up to $150 million in ‘one-time’ support from the Federal Government.  Original CBC story on the issue .

There are no excuses that will justify this pathetic abuse of public finance.  Financial crisis?  They were falling apart before GM cut their ad budgets.  Losing audience?  Stop treating them like morons.  Can’t pay your bills?  Stop trying to monopolize the Canadian media industry.


The Canadian public will no longer tolerate the blatant abuse of our money.

CBC Top Ranked Across Canada … So Let’s Cut It

Posted on by 0 comment

While the numbers don’t lie, I’m sure other people will be tempted to find ways to suggest that Canadians aren’t interested in public media.

This review of radio hours logged by Canadians shows that the CBC dominates most major markets or urban areas.

Which begs the question:  why intentionally piss off so many Canadians just to satisfy partisan politics?

Category: media | Tags: ,

Exceptional Piece on the CBC and the Cons

Posted on by 0 comment

Ian Morrison with Friends of Canadian Broadcasting put together this piece for The Straight . He zeroes in on the CBC and its relationship with the Cons.

Happy Reading!

Category: Uncategorized | Tags: ,