Monthly Archives: November 2018

Scheer’s Plan for Gangs ‘Shockingly Stupid, Unconstitutional’

Posted on by 0 comment

Folks, we’ve got less than a year to knock Scheer’s train off the rails.

Here’s a great story to spread, especially to many ‘common sense’ Conservatives that we now are sitting in the wings:

Lawyers call Scheer’s plan to combat gangs “shockingly stupid”, “unconstitutional” and full of “lies”

The Conservative plan to take care of gangs in Canada would simply START with shockingly unconstitutional plans to invade and ruin Canadian civil liberties.

Where will these plans end? With ALL of us in jail?

Let’s stop these goons before they get started.

Category: Uncategorized

Left-wing liberal media, my ass

Posted on by 0 comment

Keep this cover page and article in your pockets for the next time some know-nothing whines about the ‘left-wing liberal’ media conspiracy that’s out to bring us communism.

How about The Ignorance?

Or the The Obliviousness?

The Old White Men Club?

Trogs well paid by the CAPP?

The Future Stops Here?

Even has jumped on the bandwagon by ridiculing this article and cover. with suggestions like:

  • The Tragically Unhip
  • Diversity is for tie colours
  • The Fellowship of The (Right) Wing
  • Siri, show me who watches the CFL
  • This picture has a combined Uber rating of 2.38.

Maclean’s – I’ve rarely found any respect for you in the past, and I continue to feel shame now for the embarrassing state of ‘investigative’ and ‘provocative’ journalism that you put together.

Oh, and if you want to know who owns Maclean’s and would like to hit them where it really hurts: Rogers Communications.

Cut your cords, transfer your cell phone accounts and cancel your magazine subscriptions.

Because if THEY want REAL resistance, we can bring it to them by boycotting this kind of tripe.

Category: Uncategorized

No One Hurt Because No One Was On The Bus

Posted on by 0 comment

We need a VERY serious discussion about public transit in Canada.

It works when it works. In fact, in many cases, there’s simply no other solution that comes remotely close to public transit.

However, filling the roads of suburbs with elongated and heavy buses is not a good answer most of the time.

Here’s an unfortunate story about a bus that swerved to avoid an erratic driver. The bus piled into a commercial building in London, ON.

The good news? No one was hurt.

That’s because no one was on the bus (except the driver).

Normally, you’d just wipe your brow and say ‘phew! Thanks goodness no one was hurt’.

But the absence of riders begs the question: why put buses on the road when they’re empty? We’re wasting gas, we’re wrecking our streets and we’re causing – NOT SOLVING – congestion issues.

Maybe I missed something like ‘it was empty because it had just unloaded a crowd of busy workers or students’.

But I know that street and I know that’s not the case.

It’s empty because it’s politically expedient to have very visible buses choking the lanes of urban and suburban streets.

We subsidize the actual driving of vehicles, not the number of passengers or the efficiency of these services.

As mentioned, we indirectly cause MORE congestion with empty buses and compound road damage and need for repairs because buses are typically much heavier than your average commuter vehicle (ie. car).

So what’s the solution?

There are many:

  • Subsidize the number of riders, not buses
  • Track all activity and optimize activity to reflect where people are, not where you think they might be impressed by a bus cruising through the neighbourhood
  • Focus on smaller, more nimble services
  • Work with automation and third-party services (eg. Lyft, Uber) to deliver flexible routes
  • Stop thinking in terms of ‘fixed’ transit corridors unless population sizes warrant this thinking. If population sizes aren’t available, build ‘consolidation areas’ for people to park and ride into core areas.
  • Think about towns in terms of ‘nodes’ instead of ‘cores’.

This last item is probably the toughest for most people to get their heads around because it twists about 2,000 years of thinking around in ways people haven’t imagined before.

We traditionally have ‘cores’ because (a) we needed them as ways to consolidate resources, especially when we were under attack by other tribes and (b) it’s an efficient way for masses of people to meet in a single place.

As businesses themselves become smaller and more nimble, the idea of ‘cores’ goes the way of the dodo. Of course, they’ll persist (see above), but with more people working from home, doing things online and focusing on digital commerce instead of physical movement, we have to rethink how and more importantly WHY we feel it’s critical to move people around by third-parties when they don’t want us to.

Category: Uncategorized