http://www.ctv.ca/qp/
I hate these polls, but we must do our best to make sure even the clowns with Con TV get the message that the long gun registry is a good thing.
http://www.ctv.ca/qp/
I hate these polls, but we must do our best to make sure even the clowns with Con TV get the message that the long gun registry is a good thing.
Step aside Rhinos and get ready for another vote split: the Pirate Party of Canada has launched.
Of course, like the Green Party, they’re a one-platform party.
I’m sure that’ll change in time and they’ll become as boring as the rest of the parties in this country, but for now, they’re going to enjoy a lot of press.
But what do I really like about these folks? Everything’s online, including their manifesto, marketing and planning activities and a live wiki page that anyone can edit.
Those are initiatives that the Libs, Dippers and especially the Cons simply don’t tolerate.
This is a good piece (9 Things to Avoid in Your Diet), but I think they could have made it even better.
How? Add an ‘ethical’ column to the products and you get a sense of what the broader implications are with each of these products.
What follows are just a few ideas. Feel free to add your own.
| Ingredient | Why it is Used | Why it is Bad | Why it’s REALLY Bad |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Colors |
|
|
|
| Artificial Flavorings |
|
|
|
| Artificial Sweeteners (Acesulfame-K, Aspartame, Equal®, NutraSweet®, Saccharin, Sweet’n Low®, Sucralose, Splenda® & Sorbitol) |
|
|
|
| Benzoate Preservatives(BHT, BHA, TBHQ) |
|
|
|
| Brominated Vegetable Oil(BVO) |
|
|
|
| High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) |
|
|
|
| MSG(Monosodium Glutamate) |
|
|
|
| Olestra |
|
|
|
| Shortening, Hydrogenated and Partially Hydrogenated Oils (Palm, Soybean and others) |
|
|
|
I loved reading about the 9 things to avoid, but I loved the exercise of exploring even more ethical and moral reasons why we need to rethink our ‘demand’ for these products.
Most of the solution comes with a very simple answer: make your own food from natural products, enjoy cooking and take the time to cook (making it a family or functional activity) and stop buying processed anything.
Unfortunately, this is a well-timed smoke-screen that is another attempt to get gullible Canucks to side with the most scandalous leadership on the planet.
I’m not a gas pricing expert, nor am I a logistics expert, but I have done a little reading about this. The question is whether or not certain pumps clog or get impeded and then, in most cases, unintentionally give the consumer less than what was recorded.
On the surface, this is a very noble effort, but let’s pull it apart a little:
I’ll address the last comment: when the Canadian dollar has been rising as it has, the price of everything else should be dropping. Over the last decade or so, we’ve seen nearly a 50% increase in the value of our currency vis-a-vis the US dollar and yet we’ve seen little to no reduction in the cost of gas, books, vegetables, fruits and other things we import on a daily basis.
Canadians are being gouged and it’s time that Tony Clement and our other so-called leaders look at what I call ‘Price Parity’ issues with imports.
As I mentioned, gas is just the tip of the iceberg, but it’s a massive portion of our disposable expenditure. The high price of gas also has an impact on nearly ALL of our daily activities.
Of course, if pushed, I would also say that gas should be $5 per litre, but that’s more because we need to reduce our reliance on gas, but as long as we’re trying to find the cause of ‘high’ prices, let’s be sure that Tony’s tantrum doesn’t misdirect us from the true cause: suppliers are gouging us.
In future blogs, I’ll address two things:
I’m late in the game about critiquing the various shenanigans of Geurgis and Jaffer, but I’m noticing one important trend: if you work for the CPC, be prepared to be thrown under a bus if you even remotely come close to f***ing up.
It’s a pretty ballsy thing to suggest and I would be the last person on the planet to actually defend the likes of Guergis or Jaffer, but look at the press releases that have come out in the last week or so:
BUT HOLD ON …
I heard Jim Prentice on the radio today say that he was approached by Jaffer A YEAR AGO with solicitations related to his business. If it was such a big issue, and has instantly become such a big issue, why the hell wasn’t this reported A YEAR AGO?
Which opens up a bigger question: if this wasn’t reported A YEAR AGO how do we know the entire caucus isn’t running around making other business deals behind the backs of Canadians? What other conversations in the hallways happened A YEAR AGO (or more or recently) that we should bring to light? Are other MPs of the governing party working with businesses on the side pitching to their buddies for sweet, no-questions-asked contracts?
Is what we’re hearing just the tip of the iceberg?
Do actions, regardless of how questionable they were A YEAR AGO, only get publicized when you’re out to lampoon people that work for you and screwed up?
I’m not one to support the Liberals with their AdScam program, but isn’t this activity in the halls of Parliament just as disgusting? Have I missed something here? Have I misunderstood what’s supposed to be happening in the halls of Parliament?
How many scandals are enough, Canada? How many?
The Helena Guergis affair is just the last of an incredibly loooooooooong line of scandals that keep flying in the face of our federal leaders.
And yet, somehow, they manage to weasel their way out of issues and back into talking about the insanity of ‘more crime bills’ or ‘economy economy economy’.
The list is far too long, but here’s a quick stab:
How many scandals constitute ‘enough’?
All it took was an inflated marketing scam with the Liberals to have them turfed. I know … it was enough to show our disgust with the Liberals.
And yet how many more people have to die / get ripped off / be booted from Cabinet or just plain f*** up in order for Canadians to finally stand up and demand an election so we can dump these clowns?
Have we all lost our minds? When people promise accountability and economic action and yet deliver the complete opposite, why are we not going to the polls?
For the record, I don’t think anyone should be making money from the Tar Sands because, quite simply, there’s no true-cost economic rationale to actually allow the Tar Sands to exist. The Tar Sands represent the ultimate in greed and ultimate in mortgaging the environmental (and subsequent economic) future of the entire planet.
However, I have a question: if a state-owned oil company from China can buy into and profit from the Tar Sands,why is it that Canada cannot have a state-owned company that buys into and profits from the Tar Sands?
I mean, if someone’s making a shit-pile of cash off this monstrosity, can’t it at least be us?
This goes under the file of ‘un-f-in-believable’.