Archive for December, 2008

All the Best for 2009!

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

Well folks, 2008 was … interesting.

I lived through what felt like Canada’s first tumble into dictatorship, thanks to Steve.  I watched the opposition parties collapse into one blend of bad policy to be picked up by another dictator-wanna-be.

In the media world, I’ve help initiate a media boycott against the like of Bell, Rogers and Canwest that I hope will pick up speed in 2009.

I’ve seen things change in the US, but I’m afraid that they won’t change enough.

And I’ve watched the capitalist system that most of us at least respect fall into disrepair not because of some trifling philosophical detail, but because everyone at the top are too blind with greed to realize that they are running the whole damn thing into the ground.

After that, I’m not going to try to recap what happened in the world that I tried to report on during 2008.  All I can say is that I did my best, tried to check my emotion at the door (although I feel my best posts were when I was most irate) and share stories that would help all of you feel energized about our futures, despite what some clowns are telling us to think/feel/do.

What I did want to take a second to reflect on was the good that happened to me:

  1. I’m alive (some friends passed this year and they’re sorely missed)
  2. I’ve got a family that I can count on
  3. I’ve got some cash flow (although like everyone out there, I’d be excited if it was bigger)
  4. We’re doing our best to get our debts under control, despite the economy
  5. I should have more chapters for my book "Excited Delirium" posted within the next week or so
  6. I will post some short stories early in the new year
  7. I plan to start another couple of books during 2009.  One will comment on the direction that the economy should take and the other will be another attempt at fiction.

In short:  life is good and I’m hoping to give more than I get in 2009.  Please comment freely and tell me how I can do better.

Nitro PDF?

Monday, December 29th, 2008

Hi folks,

This is a tech request:  somehow, I got this extension on my Firefox browser called Nitro PDF which has destroyed my ability to read PDF files.

Does anyone know how to get rid of Nitro PDF?

CBC To Be Cut By $200 Million?

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

We know the Harpercrites hate the public and we know they hate public broadcasting even more.  Maybe it was Peter Mansbridge and his ‘daring’ questioning of our repugnant leader just a few weeks ago.

"Is a coalition really such a bad thing?"

"Die Peter, Die".  (Could it be that he really meant to say "The Peter, The"?).

Anyways, this broadcast spells out that the CBC is likely to lose $200 million in funding from the federal government. This kind of a cut would sabotage the effectiveness and ability of the CBC to properly and professionally report on activities in Canada and abroad.

The shame is beyond belief, despite the fact that I haven’t been a great friend of the CBC lately.  Of course, the lack of desire of the CBC to show some strength has been severely hampered by the constant threats and it’s likely that they’ll all continue to cower in fear that the rumours come to light.

As Canadians, we need to continue to steel ourselves to the resolve to boycott all other media sources, including CTV (Conservative TeleVision) or ConWest and throw as much support as we can behind the CBC, given that it at least gives a minor semblance of public fairness in reporting and media coverage.

And don’t forget to write your opposition MPs.  Don’t bother with the Cons:  they could care less about what you think.

P.S.  Don’t forget that if the Cons ever got a majority, the CBC would be vaporized, amongst a broad swath of a number of other Canadian institutions.

Al Qaeda joins ranks of Peter Pan, Zeus

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

According to this official , there is no Al Qaeda.  The truth about the war on terror becomes more obvious:  identify who benefits and you identify who causes / caused the problems.

"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US." Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook

For nearly a decade now, we’ve eliminated a substantial swath of social programs that would make Canada a better country so that we could ‘invest’ in the defense industry to the tune of $500 billion, using terrorism as an excuse.

This is clearly a mistake.

Happy New Year: Top 25 Censored Stories in 2009

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

Tis the time of Janus, where we look forward to 2009 and back to 2008 at the same time.  What have we learned?  Are we making progress or are we stuck in the mud?

Project Censored has released its list of top censored stories in 2008 and 2009 and, with the power of the web, they’ll cease to be as ‘private’ as the mainstream media intended.

Here’s the full list for your enjoyment (with apologies to Project Censored, I’ve re-pasted the links below, just in case the lead story experiences a page change):

What are your favourite under-reported stories for Canada in 2008 and what do you think they will be in 2009?  My suggestions include the following:

  1. The Cadman Affair.  What does Stephen Harper know about this?
  2. The Coalition:  Which unelected coalition will Canadians be forced to choose?
  3. Afghanistan:  end date = when?
  4. Canadian Unions Forced to take a back seat to bailouts
  5. HPV and the impact on young women
  6. Vaccines and the impact on all young children
  7. Nuclear power lobbying:  when will it end and when will we be able to move on to viable renewables?
  8. The NDP-Green coalition:  Canada’s future in the making
  9. Canada’s Trade Deal with Colombia
  10. From SPP to North American Union:  Canada’s efforts to harmonize currencies
  11. Tar Sands:  How much gain for how much pain to Canadians?

Please post your suggestions below and we’ll do our best to keep track of them during the year.

You Can’t Fight the Tsunami of Structural Change

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

Structural change is upon us.  Our leaders can’t fight it.  As they embarass themselves with bailout after bailout, they fail to stop and look at what’s happening around them.

Structural change is an inherent decrease in demand for stuff we don’t want.  In fact, we don’t even think we need it any more, mainly because the tools of demand generation (mainstream publishers and marketing agencies) are failing to connect with the average user or ‘consumer’.

This article
points to some clues that retail sales are going to continue to plunge.  In December through to Christmas Eve, retail sales fell 8% from the previous month. (more…)

Canada’s Political (Colour) Spectrum

Friday, December 26th, 2008

Is a Green just a yellow Blue?

Is an Orange just a yellow Red?

No. The Greens in Canada are substantially better than the Blues and the Reds can’t hold a candle to the Oranges.

In 2009, Purple will be the colour of Parliament.

With the help of Red, Blue become the furthest right on the spectrum (see below).

Canada's Political Colour Spectrum

The Reds under Ignatieff have merged with the Blues under the Harpercrites and have formed a nice shade of purple. It’s exceptionally unlikely that the hopes of a ‘progressive’ coalition will rule Canada and it’s even more unlikely that the Liberals will do what must be done to defeat the Conservative regime.

It’s because purple has long been associated with royalty, the self-appointed leaders of our free world and devotees of themselves and their family over the interests of the country at large. Purple is better known as a shade aligned with elitism and dominance as opposed to softness and congeniality.

Purples are perfectionists. Purple people are secretive, unwilling to trust and they are often known to be religious zealots. No surprise there, really.

According to one source ,

In their way of thinking, [purples] are the ones put here to enforce religion for God. These people can be just a little frightening when they start searching for their holy grail.

We’ve seen it already with the Blues. Votes against gay marriage. Policies that encourage the growth of families and discourage women from working. The potential for acts against the human fetus to be considered an act of murder. Bill C-10.

There’s little to no point in seeing the Reds (Liberals) as being anything different from the Blues (the Conservative regime). In the past few decades, their records speak for themselves. Patronage appointments. Ad Scam. The growth of the defence business in Canada. The end of EI. The strangling of small businesses in the interests of large corporate persuaders. The rise of the security state. The neglect of a little agreement called the Kyoto Accord.

Both parties stand accused. Both parties stand guilty.

Yes, Green is a yellow Blue, which means they have a sentiment that leans more towards the market when it comes to solutions for our economy, but at least they are brave enough to stand up to the bullies that ran/run the Environment portfolio. They have made their presence known on international stages when our Blues are too cowardly to show their faces.

Green is the colour of healing and health. Green personalities want to offer solutions and give without want of compensation or accolades. Greens represent a fresh sentiment and for those who are business-minded, green is the colour of money (or it was in Canada a long time ago). With that in mind, ‘Green’ opportunities are all the rage becuase the people that vote for Greens – generally a younger audience – believe in making investments in the future as opposed to propping up dying industries and carving great scars into the side of our planet that will never heal and will remind hundreds of generations of how selfish we were.

Greens are described as peacemakers and seek out harmony, but "they need to be careful not to make martyrs of themselves ".

And yes, Oranges are yellow Reds, in that they seek a more progressive solution to the woes of the world compared to the Liberals. In the past, Oranges under the leadership of Douglas or Broadbent have helped the likes of Lester Pearson, Pierre Trudeau or even a Conservative like John Diefenbaker rise to truly unique status as Canadian icons.

It’s no surprise that Tommy Douglas was nominated The Greatest Canadian, as he pushed for healthcare and a number of other reforms that would respect the sanctity (and sanity) of the common person. Without healthcare, we’d be in the same situation as Americans, as they sell their over-leveraged homes in order to pay grossly inflated medical bills.*

Oranges root for the underdog. They’d walk in front of a bus to save someone, if only because it’s the damned right thing to do.

And Orange people are great lovers of nature. In fact, they tend to be those that are hired to have a command over our natural bounty. Farmers. Loggers. Miners. Builders. Caregivers.

It’s no surprise that the prevalance of unions is within these professions. People that are too disparate and kind to think that other people would want to take advantage of them. But as they get the Blues and Reds walking all over them when they agree to auto bailouts or other industrial blunders the result should be obvious: don’t push an Orange. They’ll find like spirits and shut you out.

And Oranges are the most likely to seek out adventure and change. Oranges will heed the bidding of the people that hire them and elect them, including those who lead us in the Parliament of Canada.

But let’s return to the Orange passion for people and the Green roots with health.

It is with this assessment that I make this plea: the Greens must find ways to cooperate with the Oranges and vice versa.

We will never defeat the Purples if we squabble amongst ourselves. We must find a peaceful way to lead Canadians into the future.

These two parties represent the only true hope that we have for a future in this country. The Reds and Blues are far too tainted with self-interest and self-aggrandizement to worry about the concerns of the lay people of this land.

It’s a pinch of temporary pain, but my request is that the Oranges find a way to back off in select ridings when strong Green candidates are there to fight for the health of our environment and our economy. Greens must do the same in ridings that are dominated by those who will not let the Purples run roughshod over their sense of livelihood.

In the last election, really just weeks ago, the people of Canada spoke. Nearly 7% of the voting population opted for Green (and they failed to get a single seat) and more than 18% voted for Oranges. Together, this represents just 25% of the vote, not enough to defeat the Harpercrites who stole 38% of the vote with their lies and deceptions.  The reality though, is that Canadians ARE voting for softer hues of Red and Blue and this trend has been growing over the last few elections.

And if the Greens and the Oranges band together to heal this country of its democratic wounds, we will have a future. We will have change. And we will end the disgust and contempt that most Canadians feel when they think of politics in this country. That 25% will rise quickly and we will put the Purples in a corner like they’ve never felt before.

I ask anyone involved with the Greens or the Oranges (NDP) to work together and find a democratic and thoughtful way to maximize the number of seats they will get in the next election.  For many committed to democracy, the next step might be a hard pill to swallow, in that we will likely have to encourage Greens to withdraw from strong Orange ridings and likewise with strong Green ridings.  The elimination of competition will create a show of solidarity and will take the Purples off guard.

Let’s do it soon though, as we’re running out of time for other solutions.

With many thanks to this site .

*NOTE: I fully acknowledge that there are many other issues involved, but I’m hoping to make a small point about the cost of healthcare in the US compared to Canada.

Assessing the Political (Colour) Spectrum of Canadian Politics

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

Canada's Political Colour Spectrum

Is a Green just a yellow Blue?

Is an Orange just a yellow Red?

No.  The Greens in Canada are substantially better than the Blues and the Reds can’t hold a candle to the Oranges.

In 2009, Purple will be the colour of Parliament.

With the help of Red, Blue become the furthest right on the spectrum.

The Reds under Ignatieff have merged with the Blues under the Harpercrites and have formed a nice shade of purple.  It’s exceptionally unlikely that the hopes of a ‘progressive’ coalition will rule Canada and it’s even more unlikely that the Liberals will do what must be done to defeat the Conservative regime.

It’s because purple has long been associated with royalty, the self-appointed leaders of our free world and devotees of themselves and their family over the interests of the country at large.  Purple is better known as a shade aligned with elitism and dominance as opposed to softness and congeniality.

Purples are perfectionists.  Purple people are secretive, unwilling to trust and they are often known to be religious zealots.  No surprise there, really.

According to one source ,

In their way of thinking, [purples] are the ones put here to enforce religion for God.  These people can be just a little frightening when they start searching for their holy grail.

We’ve seen it already with the Blues.  Votes against gay marriage.  Policies that encourage the growth of families and discourage women from working.  The potential for acts against the human fetus to be considered an act of murder.  Bill C-10.

There’s little to no point in seeing the Reds (Liberals) as being anything different from the Blues (the Conservative regime).  In the past few decades, their records speak for themselves.  Patronage appointments.  Ad Scam.  The growth of the defence business in Canada.  The end of EI.  The strangling of small businesses in the interests of large corporate persuaders.  The rise of the security state.  The neglect of a little agreement called the Kyoto Accord.

Both parties stand accused.  Both parties stand guilty.

Yes, Green is a yellow Blue, which means they have a sentiment that leans more towards the market when it comes to solutions for our economy, but at least they are brave enough to stand up to the bullies that ran/run the Environment portfolio.  They have made their presence known on international stages when our Blues are too cowardly to show their faces.

Green is the colour of healing and health.  Green personalities want to offer solutions and give without want of compensation or accolades.  Greens represent a fresh sentiment and for those who are business-minded, green is the colour of money (or it was in Canada a long time ago).  With that in mind, ‘Green’ opportunities are all the rage becuase the people that vote for Greens – generally a younger audience – believe in making investments in the future as opposed to propping up dying industries and carving great scars into the side of our planet that will never heal and will remind hundreds of generations of how selfish we were.

Greens are described as peacemakers and seek out harmony, but "they need to be careful not to make martyrs of themselves ".

And yes, Oranges are yellow Reds, in that they seek a more progressive solution to the woes of the world compared to the Liberals.  In the past, Oranges under the leadership of Douglas or Broadbent have helped the likes of Lester Pearson, Pierre Trudeau or even a Conservative like John Diefenbaker rise to truly unique status as Canadian icons.

It’s no surprise that Tommy Douglas was nominated The Greatest Canadian, as he pushed for healthcare and a number of other reforms that would respect the sanctity (and sanity) of the common person.  Without healthcare, we’d be in the same situation as Americans, as they sell their over-leveraged homes in order to pay grossly inflated medical bills.*

Oranges root for the underdog.  They’d walk in front of a bus to save someone, if only because it’s the damned right thing to do.

And Orange people are great lovers of nature.  In fact, they tend to be those that are hired to have a command over our natural bounty.  Farmers.  Loggers.  Miners.  Builders.  Caregivers.

It’s no surprise that the prevalance of unions is within these professions.  People that are too disparate and kind to think that other people would want to take advantage of them.  But as they get the Blues and Reds walking all over them when they agree to auto bailouts or other industrial blunders the result should be obvious:  don’t push an Orange.  They’ll find like spirits and shut you out.

And Oranges are the most likely to seek out adventure and change.  Oranges will heed the bidding of the people that hire them and elect them, including those who lead us in the Parliament of Canada.

But let’s return to the Orange passion for people and the Green roots with health.

It is with this assessment that I make this plea:  the Greens must find ways to cooperate with the Oranges and vice versa.

We will never defeat the Purples if we squabble amongst ourselves.  We must find a peaceful way to lead Canadians into the future.

These two parties represent the only true hope that we have for a future in this country.  The Reds and Blues are far too tainted with self-interest and self-aggrandizement to worry about the concerns of the lay people of this land.

It’s a pinch of temporary pain, but my request is that the Oranges find a way to back off in select ridings when strong Green candidates are there to fight for the health of our environment and our economy.  Greens must do the same in ridings that are dominated by those who will not let the Purples run roughshod over their sense of livelihood.

In the last election, really just weeks ago, the people of Canada spoke.  Nearly 7% of the voting population opted for Green (and they failed to get a single seat) and more than 18% voted for Oranges.  Together, this represents just 25% of the vote, not enough to defeat the Harpercrites who stole 38% of the vote with their lies and deceptions.

But if the Greens and the Oranges band together to heal this country of its democratic wounds, we will have  a future.  We will have change.  And we will end the disgust and contempt that most Canadians feel when they think of politics in this country.  That 25% will rise and you will put the Purples in a corner like they’ve never felt before.

It is under the leadership of a Green-Orange coalition that the country’s true wide political spectrum will be felt.

If you’re with either the Greens or Oranges, please do this today.

If you vote for either the Greens or Oranges, encourage your leaders today to engage in talks of forming such a coalition.

With many thanks to this site .

*NOTE:  I fully acknowledge that there are many other issues involved, but I’m hoping to make a small point about the cost of healthcare in the US compared to Canada.

Conservative TV: Canada’s Tory Voice (CTV)

Monday, December 22nd, 2008

Job creation by the Conservatives now total 39.  18 bloated Senate positions and 21 new seats for the province of Ontario, all in the hope that the people of Ontario will continue to be blind to the fact that Harper is blind to manufacturing in this country.

And now that Mike Puffy has been assigned to a greater power , we certainly know the reason why:  the CTV has been Canada’s Tory Voice or the Conservative TV network for years.

Please, people:  do yourself a favour and do us all a favour by boycotting the CTV network, Bell Canada and other harbingers of the Harpercrites.

In the interim, I really must give lots of credit to these guys for this logo:

Conservative TV:  Canada's Tory Voice

Stimulus for ALL Sectors

Monday, December 22nd, 2008

Hi everyone,

I’ve copy/pasted below a letter from Tonya Surman and Peter Clutterbuck of the Ontario Non-Profit Network.  It’s imperative that we do everything we can to encourage Jim Flaherty and all of the other folks who will have an impact on the Jan 27 economic stimulus package to consider helping the non-profit, charity and co-op sectors.

Here’s their letter:

Please forward this email to your networks!

Dear Friends,
As you are well aware, federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is in the midst of shaping an economic stimulus package, which he will deliver to the nation on January 27. Please stand up and let the politicians know that the nonprofit sector must be a part of this package.

Attached is an open letter from the Ontario Nonprofit Network that underscores the importance of the nonprofit sector to the fabric of our nation. The letter, which is being sent to Canada’s politicians and thought leaders, calls on our political leaders to see the nonprofit sector as a vital part of the economic stimulus solution for Ontario and Canada.

Each segment of the nonprofit sector has specific needs and you know best what yours are. We urge you to use the contacts you have with the federal government—through your funders, supporters, and formal and informal associations—to tell the federal Finance Minister of your specific needs. Please feel free to use the attached letter, in whole or in part, as part of your message.

We recommend, in addition, that you brief your local MPs and MPPs about your needs and the overall value of the nonprofit sector. Again, feel free to use ONN’s open letter.

Kindly keep ONN, which serves to connect and give voice to this vibrant sector, informed of your actions and successes. Please let us know who you’ve contacted, what you’ve told them and what kind of response you’ve received. You can email us at info@ontariononprofitnetwork.ca. If there is tremendous interest, we will create an online dialogue to continue the discussion.

To stay up-to-date on ONN activities and to be part of this important Network, visit our site here .